India's meek response to the Chinese crackdown in Tibet - Instablogs
India's meek response to the Chinese crackdown in Tibet
Jayaprashanth , bangalore: Mar 26 2008
Made Popular Mar 26 2008
India :

India's meek response to the Chinese crackdown in Tibet

India currently is treading nervous territory with the Indian government trying to avoid taking a stance against the Chinese crackdown of the Tibetan protests. This can be attributed to two main causes. The huge economic trade worth $60 billion, which is now happening between India and China is one major reason. Another reason is the Indo-US nuclear deal, for which India needs China’s support during the crucial NSG meet of which China is a part. And this is why New Delhi’s response was muted when it issued this statement,

“We are distressed by reports of the unsettled situation and violence in Lhasa and by the deaths of innocent people. We would hope that all those involved will work to improve the situation and remove the causes of such trouble in Tibet, which is an autonomous region of China, through dialogue and non-violent means.”

Furthermore, India even arrested the Tibetan protestors and later let them off. And the reason the toothless Indian government gives is,

“Like our other guests, Tibetan refugees, while they are in India, are expected to refrain from political activities and those activities that affect our relations with other friendly countries.”

All this is making China more confident that it will not face any hurdle from India regarding the Tibet issue in the future. But what India really needs to do is protest vociferously against the Chinese occupation of Tibet to make sure that China doesn’t take advantage of India’s muted response and continue the violence in Tibet. By being so meek, India may have emboldened China to usurp India’s eastern most state, Arunachal Pradesh, which China has been eyeing for quite a long time now.

Image: latimes

Source: tribuneindia

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Parul G
Delhi, India
I am not surprised with India’s reaction. India takes pride in labeling itself as a peace-loving nation. Ever since India got it independence it is following the so-called peace policies. And other nations, its neighbours in particular, take it as India’s weakness. Kargil war and the subsequent lose of thousands of army personnel lives bear testimony to that.
1 Stars
Desh
Shimla, India
Jay, a very well knitted argument indeed. But, I don’t know why, I seriously feel that India’s, you mentioned, meek stand is justified provided the reasons you’ve cited above. Whereas Arunachal is concerned, the things have really undergone drastic changes in the last 3 decades or so. China is now aware of Indian forces, that too, better than before.
1 Stars
Sameer Kumar
Hyderabad, India
India and meek- that about sounds right. That is the way we have always carried ourselves around. ’Peace-Loving’ is almost another term for being spineless in Indian politics. We take no stand on anything in a substantial fashion and almost always stand on the fence. So this is almost like ”No News” for us.

It is also shows how ridiculous we are in the fact that independence of Bangladesh was important, but Tibet is not an issue.
1 Stars
Arpita Mukherjee
Kolkata, India
India’s Tibet policy was faulty right from the start when China invaded Tibet in 1949. The Indian politicians and PM Nehru in particular considered it important to continue their bonhomie with Communist China underming the importance of Tibet as a buffer zone. However, the ’Indi-chini bhai bhai’ was reciprocated by China by invading Arunachal Pradesh.
For India, currently maintaining friendly ties with China is far more important from the economic point of view than supporting the Tibetan cause.
Add your Comment